AMA Amends Ethical Guidance on Physician Immunizations

Outlines precautions for non-immunized physicians to protect patients and colleagues

Translate to Spanish or other 102 languages!

Image for illustration purposes only

Mega Doctor News

- Advertisement -

CHICAGO – Physicians who are not immunized from a vaccine-preventable disease have an ethical responsibility to take appropriate actions to protect patients and colleagues, according to amended ethical guidance adopted by physicians at today’s Special Meeting of the American Medical Association (AMA) House of Delegates.

The AMA Code of Medical Ethics has long maintained that physicians have a strong ethical duty to accept immunizations when a safe, effective vaccine is available. This is especially true when a highly transmissible disease poses significant risks to patients and colleagues.

However, it is not ethically problematic to exempt individuals when a specific vaccine poses a risk due to underlying medical conditions. Ethical concerns arise when individuals are allowed to decline vaccinations for non-medical reasons, according to a report presented to the House of Delegates by the AMA Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. 

“Physicians and other health care workers who decline to be immunized with a safe and effective vaccine, without a compelling medical reason, can pose an unnecessary medical risk to vulnerable patients or colleagues, said AMA Board Member Michael Suk, M.D., J.D., M.P.H., M.B.A. “Physicians must strike an ethical balance between their personal commitments as moral individuals and their obligations as medical professionals.”

According to the newly amended AMA ethical guidance, “physicians who are not or cannot be immunized have a responsibility to voluntarily take appropriate actions to protect patients, fellow health care workers and others.” This includes refraining from direct patient contact.

Delegates also approved guidance asserting the responsibility of physicians practices and health care institutions to proactively develop policies and procedures for responding to epidemic or pandemic disease with input from practicing physicians, institutional leadership and appropriate specialists. Such policies and procedures should outline appropriate protective equipment allocation, staff immunization programs and infection control practices, including those that limit patient and staff exposure to individuals who are not immunized.

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

- Advertisement -

More Articles

McAllen Cancer Survivor Takes Her Fight for Patients to Washington

For breast cancer survivor Elvia Gibbs, traveling from McAllen to Washington, D.C., was about more than advocating for legislation. It was an opportunity to tell lawmakers firsthand that cancer research and access to clinical trials can mean more time, hope, and quality of life for patients.

Susie Wiles Announces She Is Cancer-Free Following Breast Cancer Treatment

White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles announced Wednesday that she is cancer-free following months of treatment for early-stage breast cancer, sharing the news after receiving clear pathology results from the Mayo Clinic.

What You Need to Know About Aortic Dissection

An aortic dissection – a tear in the inner layer of the main artery – is a life-threatening emergency. It can happen with little warning, as apparently was the case with U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham. His sudden death at age 71 was preliminarily attributed to an aortic dissection stemming from plaque buildup in his arteries.

DHR Health’s Free Seminar on Breakthrough Treatment for Stroke Survivors, Sept. 19th

DHR Health’s Neuroscience Institute will host a free seminar for stroke survivors who want improved hand and arm movement as many stroke survivors experience impaired mobility and loss of function in the arm which can significantly affect their ability to   perform everyday activities.
- Advertisement -