loader image
Sunday, November 10, 2024
91.3 F
McAllen
We Welcome your Press Release
- Advertisement -

Urging caution on AI in mammography

Translate to Spanish or other 102 languages!

Doctors should proceed cautiously, because similar technological leaps previously led to higher rates of false-positive tests and over-treatment. Newswise Image
Doctors should proceed cautiously, because similar technological leaps previously led to higher rates of false-positive tests and over-treatment. Newswise Image

Mega Doctor News

- Advertisement -

 By University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Health Sciences 

Newswise — Analyzing breast-cancer tumors with artificial intelligence has the potential to improve healthcare efficiency and outcomes. But doctors should proceed cautiously, because similar technological leaps previously led to higher rates of false-positive tests and over-treatment.

That’s according to a new editorial in JAMA Health Forum co-written by Joann G. Elmore, MD, MPH, a researcher at the UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, the Rosalinde and Arthur Gilbert Foundation Endowed Chair in Health Care Delivery and professor of medicine at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA.

- Advertisement -

“Without a more robust approach to the evaluation and implementation of AI, given the unabated adoption of emergent technology in clinical practice, we are failing to learn from our past mistakes in mammography,” the JAMA Health Forum editorial states. The piece, posted online Friday, was co-written with Christoph I. Lee, MD, MS, MBA, a professor of radiology at the University of Washington School of Medicine.

One of those “past mistakes in mammography,” according to the authors, was adjunct computer-aided detection (CAD) tools, which grew rapidly in popularity in the field of breast cancer screening starting more than two decades ago. CAD was approved by the FDA in 1998, and by 2016 more than 92% of U.S. imaging facilities were using the technology to interpret mammograms and hunt for tumors. But the evidence showed CAD did not improve mammography accuracy. “CAD tools are associated with increased false positive rates, leading to overdiagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ and unnecessary diagnostic testing,” the authors wrote. Medicare stopped paying for CAD in 2018, but by then the tools had racked up more than $400 million a year in unnecessary health costs.

“The premature adoption of CAD is a premonitory symptom of the wholehearted embrace of emergent technologies prior to fully understanding their impact on patient outcomes,” Elmore and Lee wrote.

The doctors suggest several safeguards to put in place to avoid “repeating past mistakes,” including tying Medicare reimbursement to “improved patient outcomes, not just improved technical performance in artificial settings.”

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

- Advertisement -

More Articles

STHS Children’s Pediatric Intensivist Receives Honorary Doctorate in His Native Country for Excellence in Medicine

Mega Doctor News Home to the largest pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) in the...

Texas A&M Public Health Students Lead Health Events in RGV Colonias, Nov. 9th & 16th

Mega Doctor News McALLEN, Texas - Students from the Texas A&M University Higher Education...

Groundbreaking for New Behavioral Health Hospital, Nov. 12th

Mega Doctor News PHARR, Texas – The City of Pharr and DHR Health will...

STHS Introduces New Digital Resuscitation Training & Education

Mega Doctor News Patients who suffer a cardiac arrest must receive the...
- Advertisement -
×