loader image
Saturday, February 7, 2026
54.7 F
McAllen
- Advertisement -

Protecting Texas Medicaid Program from Unlawful Federal Changes

Translate to Spanish or other 102 languages!

The lawsuit argues that the imposed requirements are neither supported by existing laws nor mandated by current regulations. Image for illustration purposes
The lawsuit argues that the imposed requirements are neither supported by existing laws nor mandated by current regulations. Image for illustration purposes

Mega Doctor News

- Advertisement -

AUSTIN – Texas Attorney General Paxton has launched a legal battle against the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), contesting a federal bulletin that poses a threat to Texas’s Medicaid program and its nearly five million beneficiaries. 

The lawsuit argues that the imposed requirements are neither supported by existing laws nor mandated by current regulations. Furthermore, Attorney General Paxton has filed a motion for a preliminary injunction to halt CMS’s actions.

Attorney General Paxton expressed concerns that CMS’s actions could jeopardize not only local governments’ ability to support Medicaid providers but also the entire state’s capacity to fund its Medicaid program. The potential consequences of CMS’s actions could lead to reduced access to healthcare for vulnerable Texans and hinder local providers’ ability to serve communities across the state.

- Advertisement -

Texas’s Medicaid program relies on funding from both the state and federal government, with local governments also contributing to ensure access to healthcare for citizens, irrespective of income level. Since 2013, and with CMS’s authorization, Texas has permitted local governments to administer Local Provider Participation Funds (LPPFs). In 2021, the Biden administration’s CMS attempted to revoke Texas Medicaid’s use of LPPFs, but a preliminary injunction was issued against this effort.

LPPFs involve local governments collecting mandatory assessments from healthcare providers and transferring these funds to the state to finance Texas’s share of non-federal Medicaid funding. Federal law explicitly allows such arrangements. However, federal law also prohibits hold harmless arrangements, which guarantee healthcare providers will receive their total tax payment back through Medicaid payments. CMS recently issued an unlawful informational bulletin that would wrongly classify private contracts involving entities that contribute to an LPPF as prohibited hold harmless arrangements, even though federal law does not prohibit such private contracts.

CMS’s bulletin revealed its intent to require the Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) to provide information about these private “hold harmless arrangements” as a prerequisite for receiving federal funding, despite the HHSC’s lack of authority to do so. This could potentially endanger billions of dollars meant for Texas’s Medicaid program. The changes represent a significant departure from CMS’s previous policy and an unprecedented expansion of its authority.

To read the full complaint, click here.  

- Advertisement -

To read the motion for preliminary injunction, click here

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

- Advertisement -

More Articles

DHR Health Strengthens Heart Health Resources for Families Across the RGV

Did you know that heart disease is one of the leading causes of death in the United States and that the Hispanic population faces a higher risk due to the high rates of blood pressure, high cholesterol, diabetes and obesity?

STHS Heart Celebrates 650th Robotic-Assisted Surgery

Mega Doctor News Since opening 30 years ago as one of the...

Inside the Physiology and Neuroscience of Winter Olympians

What makes Olympians the very best at what they do — even in cold, slippery or icy conditions? 

Study Finds 60% of American Women Choose Clinic Visits Over At‑Home Cervical Screening

American women now have the option of screening for cervical cancer at home, using newly approved self-collection tools. While experts hope this will increase uptake in the under-screened population, a first-of-its kind study by researchers from The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center found the majority (60.8%) still prefer to see a medical professional in-clinic.
- Advertisement -
×