AG Paxton Celebrates a Victory for Life

Translate to Spanish or other 102 languages!

Attorney General Paxton released the following statement after a federal judge sided with the Texas Attorney General and issued an injunction to stop the Biden Administration from using the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) to force Texas hospitals and doctors to perform abortions. Image for illustration purposes
Attorney General Paxton released the following statement after a federal judge sided with the Texas Attorney General and issued an injunction to stop the Biden Administration from using the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) to force Texas hospitals and doctors to perform abortions. Image for illustration purposes

Mega Doctor News

- Advertisement -

AUSTIN, Texas – Attorney General Paxton released the following statement after a federal judge sided with the Texas Attorney General and issued an injunction to stop the Biden Administration from using the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) to force Texas hospitals and doctors to perform abortions:

“The court’s decision to side with Texas is a crucial step in preventing Joe Biden and his radical pro-abortion Administration from breaking the law and threatening our entire healthcare industry by withholding federal funds. We’re not going to allow left-wing bureaucrats in Washington to transform our hospitals and emergency rooms into walk-in abortion clinics, and the decision last night proves what we knew all along: the law is on our side. No matter how many backdoors Joe Biden attempts to go through to illegally force abortions in Texas, I will fight back to defend our pro-life laws and Texas mothers and children.”

The judge’s decision’s comes after Paxton filed the initial lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Health and Humans Services in mid-July and moved for an injunction in early August.

- Advertisement -

“The Court concludes that the Guidance extends beyond EMTALA’s authorizing text in three ways: it discards the requirement to consider the welfare of unborn children when determining how to stabilize a pregnant woman; it claims to preempt state laws notwithstanding explicit provisions to the contrary; and it impermissibly interferes with the practice of medicine in violation of the Medicare Act,” the court stated in its decision.

To read the full court decision, click here.

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

- Advertisement -

More Articles

DHR Health Raises Over $520K at 20th “Fishing for Hope” Event

DHR Health made a big splash at the 20th Annual “Fishing for Hope” Tournament, held on August 22 at Jim’s Pier in South Padre Island, raising an impressive grand total of $524,130.

FDA Approves First in Class Targeted Therapy for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved Rasonque (daraxonrasib), a RAS inhibitor for the most common form of pancreatic cancer—delivering a new treatment option to patients with advanced pancreatic cancer months ahead of schedule. 

STHS Behavioral Marks Suicide Prevention Month with Community Chalk Event

Every 11 minutes, someone in the United States dies by suicide, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), making it one of the nation's leading causes of death.

Moderna and Merck Report Positive Phase 3 Results for Personalized Cancer Therapy

Moderna and Merck have reached a major clinical milestone after their investigational individualized cancer therapy, combined with Merck’s Keytruda, produced positive results in a Phase 3 study involving patients with high-risk melanoma.
- Advertisement -