AG Paxton Celebrates a Victory for Life

Translate to Spanish or other 102 languages!

Attorney General Paxton released the following statement after a federal judge sided with the Texas Attorney General and issued an injunction to stop the Biden Administration from using the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) to force Texas hospitals and doctors to perform abortions. Image for illustration purposes
Attorney General Paxton released the following statement after a federal judge sided with the Texas Attorney General and issued an injunction to stop the Biden Administration from using the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) to force Texas hospitals and doctors to perform abortions. Image for illustration purposes

Mega Doctor News

- Advertisement -

AUSTIN, Texas – Attorney General Paxton released the following statement after a federal judge sided with the Texas Attorney General and issued an injunction to stop the Biden Administration from using the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) to force Texas hospitals and doctors to perform abortions:

“The court’s decision to side with Texas is a crucial step in preventing Joe Biden and his radical pro-abortion Administration from breaking the law and threatening our entire healthcare industry by withholding federal funds. We’re not going to allow left-wing bureaucrats in Washington to transform our hospitals and emergency rooms into walk-in abortion clinics, and the decision last night proves what we knew all along: the law is on our side. No matter how many backdoors Joe Biden attempts to go through to illegally force abortions in Texas, I will fight back to defend our pro-life laws and Texas mothers and children.”

The judge’s decision’s comes after Paxton filed the initial lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Health and Humans Services in mid-July and moved for an injunction in early August.

- Advertisement -

“The Court concludes that the Guidance extends beyond EMTALA’s authorizing text in three ways: it discards the requirement to consider the welfare of unborn children when determining how to stabilize a pregnant woman; it claims to preempt state laws notwithstanding explicit provisions to the contrary; and it impermissibly interferes with the practice of medicine in violation of the Medicare Act,” the court stated in its decision.

To read the full court decision, click here.

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

- Advertisement -

More Articles

Dr. Lisa Chapa Explains Why Not Every Breast Lump Is Cancer

 Discovering a lump in the breast can cause immediate concern, but many breast abnormalities are not cancerous, according to Dr. Lisa Chapa, a breast surgeon who explained how physicians distinguish benign conditions from breast cancer.

DHR Health Expands Behavioral Health Team with Dr. Alexandra Treviño, Psychiatrist

 DHR Health, the largest provider of specialty healthcare in the Rio Grande Valley, is pleased to announce that Dr. Alexandra Treviño, has joined its team of physicians.

New Breast Cancer Treatments Offer More Personalized Options for Patients in 2026

Advances in genetic testing and clinical research are giving physicians new ways to select breast cancer treatments based on individual patients' needs, according to Dr. Joseph Murray, senior medical director at Caris Life Sciences

Dr. Alvaro Restrepo Urges Breast Cancer Survivors to Focus on Health Beyond Treatment

Breast cancer survivorship involves more than completing treatment, according to Dr. Alvaro Restrepo, a medical oncologist and hematologist at Texas Oncology McAllen, who urged patients to focus on physical health, emotional well-being, and long-term medical care.
- Advertisement -